Thursday, October 5

Being frendly and the bonds of friendship

 Definition  

Friendship is a topic requiring a working definition which I propose as follows:  

As a noun: One whose shared interests underpins a deep affection, trust and rapport independent of sexual or family love. 

As a verb: welcoming, accepting, empathetic, kindly and being loyal.  

Ideas on how friendships may have first formed

According to many evolutionary biologists friendship may have developed as necessary enhancement to survival. Even in the upper echelons of the animal Kingdom we notice  a form of friendship and deep affection amongst social animals. 

For instance a pride of lions  rely on trust as successful hunters (involving skilful and strategic teamwork) of  very large animals inclusive of elephants - continually reinforced given the obvious tell-tale signs of fondness we witness within the hierarchy of the pride.   

Friends and Happiness  

In a publication entitled “Friends and Happiness: An Evolutionary Perspective on Friendship” the authors David M G Lewis of Murdoch University, Leith Al Sheaf  of the University of Colorado, Eric M Russell of the University of Texas  and David M Buss even talk about the development of reciprocal altruism as an evolutionary long term survival advantage.      

The authors suggest our evolutionary journey was reliant on hunting or scavenging large animals (to obtain the necessary protein to underpin larger brains) that required a collaborative effort based on trusted friends within the tribal structure. 

“Who are we? Where did we come from?”

Likewise Dr.Hugo Zeberg of the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden reports on new technologies, research and collaborations to begin to answer the question: “Who are we? Where did we come from?”

The answer is we have far more in common with our extinct or ancient cousins than we ever thought.

Scientists hypothesize that the idea of sticking together and adding friendly support became integral to our survival represented in those genes that make up our present footprint.

Blood Brothers

Noting past societies had traditions of close, loving, male friendships — sometimes called “blood brothers”. Blood brotherhoods are common among hunter-gatherer societies and early warrior societies, often involving an exchange of blood or vows. Among the Akwe-Shavante, indigenous people of western Brazil, parents encourage their sons to develop one or two close friends, their i-amo (“my other” or “my partner”), who become their companion for life. 

Evolutionary traits arising from the great migrations

The attributes we associate with friends continue to define someone who will be supportive and trustworthy. Such traits were particularly important during the great migratory journeys, for tribespeople to rely on those bonds to find their way through violent climatic upheavals. So that an affinity with nature and reliance on skills and social interaction leading to deep affection and dependence became an existential reality.    

Those challenges shaped that need for deep relationships and with nature.   

Friendships of First Nations People and the kinship system  

Women’s friendships were forged principally as carers,  food gatherers, storytellers and in ensuring socialisation within the mob or clan. On the other hand young men reaching maturity received tutoring in the law and their responsibilities.

But the concept of friendship was much wider than European ideas. Within each nation (there were approximately 500 pre colonisation with their own language) there were complex laws and customs governed aspects of their existence. Therein that gave expression to deep feelings of affection for not only the land but across the nation.

This was achieved by virtue of the concept of “Moëty"where one is born either as a hunter-gatherer (on one side of the "Moety" ) or as a conservationist charged with ecological responsibility on the other. Their respective responsibilities were defined by predetermined “Totems". Within that nation all peoples in the clans and mobs are regarded as close friends where they were born on your side of the Moëty you belong to.   

So, to reiterate, wherever you travelled within a nation (defined by landmark boundaries) all those within your side of the Moëty must show hospitality and friendship.

The complex nature of how this works dates back to the Creation stories, embedded in the Dreamtime, ensuring everything can be seen as two halves, inclusive of yourself and your environment. 

Accordingly, pre colonization, the Moëty system existed across Australia where there is a section or subsection system with four to eight ‘skin names’. Individuals gain ‘skin names’ upon birth based on the skin names of his or her parents, to indicate the section/subsection that he/she belongs to. The children must not marry into that side of the Moiety, regarded as their extended family, but alternate with each generation.  

Totems as predetermined existential responsibilities  

The foundation of the kinship system is the totems where each person has at least four: one personal, family, clan and nation totem. The Totems provide a link to the physical universe: to land, water, geographical features, and animals. The family, clan and nation totems are pre-ordained but an additional individual totem is decided by tribal elders to recognize personal strengths.They convey your clan’s  responsibility and the landmarks and rights within those designated areas. 

For instance if Emu was a designated Totem, then one side of the Moëty in the clan would have expertise in hunting for that animal whilst one born on the opposite side as a conservationist ensures eggs are not taken to preserve sustainability. They would know everything about its life cycle and habitat.    

Individuals then are accountable for their totems and are to ensure these totems are protected and passed on to future generations. This then invokes a friendship to the earth and its landmarks believed to be bequeathed by the creative spirits.  

Skin Names explained 

The 3rd level of the kinship system are skin names. They define the relationship of one another and their obligations to one another. An individual doesn't have the same skin name as their parent's, husband and wife. Rather It is a sequential system based on the mother’s name (in a matrilineal system), or the father’s name (in a patrilineal system), and has either a four cycle or 8 cycle naming cycle.

To reiterate, on each side of the "Moety" the children who marry must marry into the opposite side until such time as the cycle is complete. The naming cycle then repeats. 

It is not hard to understand why the early anthropologists had no idea what it meant and how it subsequently became compromised with the decimation of the clans and nations.   

An Aristolean perspective

In Ancient Greece his idea for friendships was those relationships which were forged by people who like each other, do good for one another, and share their aspirations during that time together.  

He identifies three kinds of friendships: one of utility, one of pleasure and finally one he called the perfect friendship. In the first type of utility, the relationship is based on the good as one to another, in the second type it is contingent on mutual pleasure arising from shared activities.  

Friendship as a motivation to do good works

Friendship contains elements of the abovementioned given we share pleasing tasks which might mean our love for dogs, for example underpins friendships involving shared activities such as walks and discussions. When a friend becomes overwhelmed then we may routinely prepare meals or act as a temporary carer and so forth.

Shared values

Their perfect type of friendship  according to Aristotle involves one forged when those friends are good and alike in virtue; for each alike wishes well to each other… they are good in themselves” , 

But the reality mostly is it is a mixture of things and it is hard to imagine a close friend relationship to develop without a common interest where some value is perceived in respect of the relationship, 

Symbolism and the wider community 

In many Asian countries for instance there is the annual celebration of Friendship Day with the custom of exchanging gifts, cards or flowers.

Friendship Day was first proposed in Paraguay in 1958 which became the catalyst of the idea of a Global Friendship Day.

Ever since the 30 July has been fervently celebrated as Friendship Day in Paraguay every year and has also been adopted by several other countries.

The World Friendship Crusade has lobbied the United Nations for several years to recognize 30 July as World Friendship Day; finally, in 2011, the General Assembly of the United Nations decided to designate 30 July as the International Day of Friendship and proceeded to invite all the Member States to observe the International Day of Friendship as per the culture and customs of their local, national and regional communities, including through education and public awareness-raising activities.

Friendship is regarded as the important gateway that builds bonds and develops camaraderie and trust between all cultures as we are mostly social people.

From a global perspective the simple action of building friendships is seen as the shift that is urgently needed in society to achieve lasting peace. The UN and UNESCO believe this would put an end to division, poverty, violence, and human rights abuses.

In a more personal level the giving of friendship bracelets is a popular practice as a token of affection which can be traced back to ancient China. Similarly the role of close friendships is evident in the biblical stories, in novels, poetry, images and in the lyrics of the popular songs such as “That’s what friends are for” – “in good times, bad times I’ll be on your side forever more”.  

 Better health and well-being linked to friendship 

According to By Michael R. Kauth, Ph.D., professor, Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences at Baylor College of Medicine the concept of friends evolved because having a close friend improved one’s chances of survival and the survival of one’s children.

That coincides with the idea we make friends as most people don’t want to feel alone, but seek validation and companionship just as they did face the perils of life so long ago. But feeling lonely doesn’t apply to some people able to substitute activities with a love of nature whose interactions might more aptly be described as only having acquaintances. 

But for the most part, according to a study of 323,000 people across 99 countries referenced by Kauth, friendship was linked to better health, greater happiness, and a higher level of well-being. If close, loving friendships are an adaptive trait that evolved among early humans, we should expect that close friendships are common and valued across cultures. 

Modern day Friendships

In modernity we are left with the remnants of our evolutionary traits despite mostly being far removed from the affinity with the land and the battle against the elements of our ancestors. What seems to form the basis of friendships today is shared activities and interests. Nothing could be more important than world peace where shared friendships whether tentatively based on trust or not seem to be the best way forward.   

Tim Delaney and Anastasia Malakova in an article in Philosophy Now categorize and analyse the different kinds of modern-day friendships.

The authors indicate that friendships are forged for safety, survival, social inclusion and to maintain a sense of identity. 

Sociologist Peter Belau (1918-2002) suggested we employ a ranking system in forming friends motivated by a perceived reward in enhancing social approvals and sending shared outlooks. 

What also occurs is that those initial strong friendships can equally drift apart for any number of reasons? 

The bonds in modernity seem much more complex to be divided into many subcategories: attached principally driven by feelings of affection or personal regard; those who provide assistance and support to one another; those who are on good terms with one another because they share certain attributes, such as religious and cultural affiliations; those who share a common interest such as music or favourite sports team; or, by those who participate in certain social activities, such as travelling or bush walking or hiking. 

Conclusion and suggested Q&A discussion points   

Clearly, the modern era has introduced many new forms of friendship that couldn't have been dreamed of by our ancestors.  But the question is are those first traits that were necessary for survival still applicable today? – I think they are in this age of the human- the Anthropocene”! : The period during which human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment.   

Q&A- discussions

Let’s be friends, or at least friendly.

Is that possible or worthwhile? Can you live a solitary existence and be happy?

There is no question from my perspective it is not only possible to be friendly but friendships were instrumental in our survival just as underpins social animals. From First Nations People we can understand how it was for all peoples in the clans and mobs to be regarded as close friends on the basis of their birth on one side of the Moëty.   

That ensured anywhere in a nation (defined by landmark boundaries) you could call on a friend to be of help when that person was on your side of the Moëty. That was the concept of the enlarged friendship group akin as if part of your family even though you may never have met.      

Friendship is regarded as the important gateway that builds bonds and develops camaraderie and trust between all cultures as we are mostly social people.

From a global perspective the simple action of building friendships is seen as the shift that is urgently needed in society to achieve lasting peace. The UN and UNESCO believe this would put an end to division, poverty, violence, and human rights abuses.

To reiterate Friendship is also linked to better health, greater happiness, and a higher level of well-being. If close, loving friendships are an adaptive trait that evolved among early humans, as I believe is the case, then we should expect that close friendships are common and valued across all cultures. 

Can you live a solitary existence and be happy?

One doubts it is possible or even practical to live a solitary life but one can accept some individuals will form an affinity with nature or a particular passion where any necessary interactions are more in the form of acquaintances.

Mental impairment may also negate that social norm to the extent deep relationships are not possible.

Can you be friends with a pet? A piece of software mimicking a human entity or even a virtual pet? Is social media the answer to friendship (as was the case for pen-pals long ago in my childhood days )?

Pets can act as friends, but it is not possible in my view for us to invent machines as real comforters other than what already exists in calming music, animal contact and the various media applications that can be continually improved.   

Does gender play a role or stage in life?

The female friendships tend to be more empathetic and socialistic whilst male bonding is usually later on with bonding to support activities, but today the roles are becoming blurred.     

Is friendship the other side (opposite) of loneliness?

That coincides with the idea as to why we make friends as most people don’t want to feel alone, but seek validation and companionship just as they did face the perils of life so long ago. But feeling lonely doesn’t apply to some people able to substitute activities with a love of nature whose interactions might more aptly be described as only having acquaintances. Friendship is not necessarily the other side (opposite) of loneliness.  There is a difference between being lonely and craving companionship as distinct to being happy in your own skin so to speak. That may allow someone to be happy in the absence of close friends.

Is friendship an end in itself, a positive good for not just wellbeing, but personal development and growth?

Their perfect type of friendship according to Aristotle involves one forged when those friends are good and alike in virtue; for each alike wishes well to each other… they are good in themselves” , 

But the reality in my view is that mostly it is a mixture of things and it is hard to imagine a close friend relationship to develop without a common interest where some value is perceived in respect of the relationship. 

What is it that makes for a good friendship? A big question, not easily answered.

In a nutshell in my view one where shared interests allow for a deep affection, trust and rapport, knowing one can always agree to disagree in providing an honest answer and one who can be relied upon in times of need.   

No comments: