If you asked someone how well they are
looking after their precious frontal brain lobes you’re likely to get a rather quizzical
look and at best maybe a reference to stimulatory activity they undertake to
keep the brain exercised. Yet from early childhood it is important we don’t
take these fragile regions for granted, because they can easily break down once
exposed to trauma or put under undue pressure.
Our precious frontal lodes came to us
very late in the evolutionary cycle and are thought to be the additional
dimension that gave us the capacity for a richer more advanced state of
consciousness. Of course consciousness itself is a rather slippery concept and
no one is quite sure precisely how the brain’s integrated circuitry brings all
of this to fruition in the frontal lobes region. However the crucial nature of
this fragile brain area becomes evident since it is the focal point to our
existence and where we formulate judgments and have the capacity to ponder
abstract concepts or come up with rich creative ideas. The downside is any
damage to the lobes or undue stress can trigger an inability to function
rationally with the risk of ensuing tragic outcomes.
Elkhonon
Goldberg, PhD an author and Professor of Neurology pointed out in a study of a
large number of unpremeditated homicides, that all of those involved, without a
single exception, were found to have evidence of prior damage to the frontal
lobes. The study demonstrated that although such a group in normal type situations
were clearly able to distinguish right from wrong, once they became involved or
subjected to any highly pressured event they revert to lower level instinctive modes
of behaviours. This poses tragic consequences for themselves and their victims,
in the absence of cognitive strategies as compensatory measures.
It also imposes
intriguing questions about the very nature of good and evil and when one can
become temporarily insane.
But even in
the absence of a prior recognisable trauma an unhealthy build-up in fear can
also precipitate many negative outcomes.
Edward Hallowell -psychiatrist –in an
Article from Harvard Business Review -re published in the Work Space area of
the Financial Review summed up the position as follows:
"As a specialist
in learning disabilities, I have found that most dangerous disability is not
any formally diagnosable condition like dyslexia or ADD (attention deficit
disorder). Its fear. When the frontal lobes approach capacity and we begin to
fear that we can't keep up, 'the relationship between their higher and lower
regions of the brain take an ominous turn. In survival mode, the deep areas of
the brain assume control and began to direct the higher regions.
As a result the whole brain gets caught in a neurological Catch 22. The deep
regions interpret the messages of overload they receive from the frontal lobes
in the same way they interpret everything. They furiously fire signals of fear,
anxiety, impatience, irritability anger or panic. In a futile attempt to do
more than is possible, the brain paradoxically reduces its ability to think
clearly."
In everyday
life a temporary loss of control through fear can happen much easier than we
can imagine. Examples abound of people, subject to intense pressure, “blowing
up” so to speak, evident in their childish outbursts where they revert to highly
simplistic communications.
Road rage is
a good example of where a pent up fear and rage can spill over to a driver behind
the wheel of car reacting irrationally in a fit of rage.
Fortunately
there are many simple things we can all do to ovoid overload, apart from combatting
the more serious maladies beyond the scope of this paper. What I always found
helpful is to plan ahead, leaving some generous time allotted for unexpected
events. Simply put, to allow time for contingencies. But what is even more important
is to avoid becoming "fearful" of failing to meet deadlines. When unforeseen
obstacles arise it is always better to negotiate a postponement than to continue
on and allow anxiety of fear to take its grip.
I also always found it extremely helpful to take time out for contemplation,
and to remind oneself there is always plenty of time to do what is really
important and not to accommodate unrealistic demands. My view is this
propensity to make unreasonable demands and to fail to allow for contingencies remains
the continuing scourges of modernity.
Hence, I think many of the problems
that beset us in modernity is not so much the rapid deployment of technology or
added complexity but the unrealistic demands we impose on one another. Rather
we fail to allow time to take care of our minds, to ensure adequate rest, to ensure
there are sensible time allowed for relaxation, for nutrition and to avoid
excessive pressure, often exerted by others with no idea of how much work is
involved.
I think what is at risk in the
roll-out of the digital transformation is the necessary human interactions to ensure
sufficient time to incorporate safeguards and reliability. Today the scope for
change is accelerating, but the question is are we advancing at such a rate of
knots that we will become compromised to the extent we risk becoming
overwhelmed. The risk is our already overtaxed brains fail to cope with the avalanche
of information and the unrelenting demands made on us.
Another aspect that is overlooked as
we move to a more robotic based existence is the reduction in the face to face
communication and the consequences of this for our overall state of wellbeing.
When you are talking to someone in a relaxed manner, your brain begins to buzz,
releasing pleasurable feelings similar to endorphins when you exercise. Counsellors
understand this principle as the very first objective is always to attempt to
get a person to calm down since there is no point in attempting to reason
rationally with someone who is in an extreme emotional state. This of course is
not always possible or practical in attempting to deal with someone in a drug
induced state or who is severely traumatised or enraged. But it helps us better
understand when to intervene and the best course of action to take in our
responses.
I have always noticed, when making
presentations the considerable advantages in talking to people in an
interactive mode, how you always feel better than addressing large groups of
people when you are in "remote" mode. When giving presentations I had
wondered why that was the case, but I now understand it was more a matter the interactive
format ensured the responsive bond meant we were all receiving reciprocal pleasurable
stimuli, that made us feel appreciative afterwards.
But nowhere is this more important than
in early learning. Youthful minds need plenty of sleep and nutrition and to
feel good about themselves before they are able to concentrate and advance in
early learning. The problems in the classroom of disruptive and unruly children
can usually be traced back to them feeling unsafe or angry. It’s probably more important
to help teach young students how to deal with their anger than it is to read
and write and some schools are beginning to understand this with miraculous
results. What was reported in relation to one school was the idea of showing
students simple pictures of happy and sad or angry people and asking them which
one applied to them.
The end result after teachers were
able to spend some time discussing different problems was an immense improvement
in outcomes. By way of example incidents in the playground of 30 -4o altercations
per month subsequently reduced to zero.
There is no doubt humans have the
marvellous capacity to be innovative and make new discoveries including a rethink
of where we go from here, but time will tell.
