Tuesday, October 12

The question of Generational memories

 

Generation Memories

 

Questions one could ask: Do we know things before we were born based on the experiences of those before us?

How valuable are the myths and stories, as memories we tell ourselves, that might form part of our DNA as suggested by Carl Jung? 


Jung was influenced by Freud (his star pupil) except when it came to the significance of myths and stories concerning religious matters. Jung’s split with Freud was due principally to Freud opposing Jung’s view in that respect. Jung saw structure and meaning in the myths and stories carried forward from one generation to another. Therein he saw a symbolic essence - a psychological inheritance if you like- represented by his archetypes. 

His Archetypes were crude representations within the subconscious. E.g.: he lists them broadly as: persona, shadow, male versus female (how we see our opposite sex in ourselves) and the various versions of the self. According to Jung they form part of the unconscious as a carry forward from one generation to another and given expression in the symbolism of myths and storytelling.     

Their relationship to each person he describes as individuation. Much later on in life he attributes them as the spiritual part of our DNA.

In this respect, rather obviously, Jung rejects the idea we are born with a blank slate so to speak. Rather, within the unconscious lie these instinctive archetypes. 

No doubt his religious views were also influenced by a near death experience whilst in his sixties. His much earlier period seems to be more of an agnostic psychiatrist (specifically that what he said about himself) but later on he turns to theology and philosophy. This is after he introduces the idea of the archetypes which he said gave structure and meaning to humanity.

But his ideas are challenged in modernity as far as they involve an element of mysticism. Even so he believed the idea of these innate universal archetypes was of relevance to science, philosophy and ethics. Of course Jungian psychology continues today. 

Such questions of a collective consciousness however (or not) remain a mystery. But, from a biological perspective, beginning at the cellular level, one realizes intelligence evolved from just a single cell. So the idea of evolving intelligence manifesting as inter -generational transference continuing in our DNA doesn't seem too far away from a concept one can consider seriously. That subject is for another day.   

But the myths and stories we tell ourselves may well be more important than is generally realized in an increasingly secular society. 

 

No comments: