Wednesday, September 21

Murder and mayhem – Mighty Tom’s trust betrayed

Tom faithfully returned each year to Eden (located on the south coast of Australia) as part of a Killer whale pod who hunted wales with the resident Homo sapiens. The arrangement was that the pod herded migratory whales into the bay, blocking off escape routes and chased them around until they were thoroughly exhausted. They then swam close to shore to the whaling station, thrashing the water with their mighty tales to signal to the whalers to man their whale boats and harvest the whales. The pod in turn was rewarded with the tongues (of no use to the whalers) which can weigh up to 4 tonnes and the lips as their share of the spoils.

No one is aware of how this unique and brutal partnership began but it is considered likely the aboriginals formed a bond before the whalers adapted a prior practice with the use of more modern equipment.  
The common bond extended not only to whaling but to shared tragedies of the cruel sea. The locals recall an extraordinary event involving a fearless young man deciding to take all of his family out to sea one fine day, boasting he was an expert seaman. But unheeding wise advice to stay within the confines of the bay his small boat capsized as a consequence of a sudden squall. His family tragically drowned and all of the bodies were recovered by the distressed community except for the father.

Tom knew where his body had lodged, firmly wedged underneath a rock with an entanglement of sea weed, but despite his best efforts to continually circle the area for several days he could not attract the attention of the whalers. Tom then joined up with the entire pod who all swam around in circles for days on end until the whalers finally realized what they were all trying to communicate. His body was subsequently recovered and it was decided on a burial service at sea, along with the Killers who witnessed the event.

But just as the trust strengthened, a series of tragic events unfolded which tore apart that trust built up over many centuries. Tom and the whales sometimes were prone to become overly enthusiastic chasing the whales around the bay and losing concentration at times becoming temporally beached in the shallower water. On one such occasion a stranger, observing the stranded killer whale rushed into the water with his gun and shot it dead. Before the local community of whalers realized what had happened the stranger had fled as the traumatized whales hastily left the bay, never to resume their migratory return. However after some considerable time Tom and some of the other whales did finally return and it was thought maybe Tom was able to persuade the pod it was a stranger unconnected to the community of whalers who had committed the murder.

However much worse was to come. There had been a change in the captaincy of the boat and the captain decided not to cut out the tongue and lips for Tom on one  fateful day before hauling the smaller( larger ones were usually left for several days) carcass ashore. One of the old time crew said to the captain “Tom is not going to like that, he’s likely to turn nasty and I don’t blame him! “.
But no amount of persuasion would change the skipper’s mind, greedy as he was to harvest the whale and not have to spend time in honoring the agreement with Tom and the pod. So he gave the order to the crewman who reluctantly headed for home.
But Tom then grasped the rope in his mouth with such force it was as if a hand had reached out and shook the boat in fury. A tug of war ensued, the skipper declaring was not going to be dictated to by a mere killer whale, so he ordered full throttle ahead until it all ended when they witnessed an amazing sight. The rope had apparently caught around one of Tom’s teeth which finally gave way as they witnessed its dislodgment and saw it sink to the sea bed. All Tom could do was to swim away in humiliated defeat. Tragically the tooth cavity became infected with an obsess, and, unable to hunt, Tom died of starvation. His body was washed up on the forshaw and it was decided to preserve his body and his skeleton which today can be seen at the maritime museum.

The missing tooth is evident and even the jaw has markings that are the exact same size as that of the roap and harpoon lines that entwined his mighty mouth so long ago when he became imprisoned within the bowels of the cruel sea.
My story is just one interpretation from the many that could be drawn from the material and photos of the whaler’s descendants, some of which can be viewed.

Old Tom           

Monday, September 19

Sir Edward Elgar "The Kingdom"

We attended the Melbourne Bach Choir performance of Sir Edward Elgar’s masterful oratorio (an oratorio is a large-scale musical composition usually on a sacred subject, for solo voices, chorus, and orchestra ) “The Kingdom” on September 18th 2016
 It was a thoroughly enjoyable recital from the large choir, orchestra, and 4 outstanding soloists with the added benefit of the magnificent Melbourne Town Hall organ in full voice. The four soloists were MiriamGordon-Stewart (soprano), Deborah Humble (mezzo-soprano), Andrew Goodwin (tenor) and James Clayton (bass). The conductor was Rick Prakhoff.
The work of Sir Edward Elgar (1857-1934) is oft overlooked in the shadow of his more famous predecessor namely Johann Sebastian Bach, (1685- 1750) and this was the first concert of this work in Melbourne since the 1940’s.

But lately appreciation for this magnificent work is gaining traction as was evident in the BBC Proms of 2014, where Sir Andrew Davis, described the work as “Elgar at his best”. Here is a recording of this rousing music under the baton of Sir Andrew Davis with the evocative story line of the very first fledgling Christian community.


Monday, September 5

Why St Paul the Apostle made so few reference to the Gospel in his letters.


St Paul was born in the ancient city of Tarsus which was the  capital in antiquity of a region known as Cilicia in south-central Turkey.
What I aim to discuss in this paper is why St Pauls letters, which make up nearly 50% of the New Testament, have few reference to the gospels.  By way of example the reference below is the sum total of his input as in Corinthians 15:3-8.  
Paul – A zealous Pharisee prior to his conversion
Paul was a Roman citizen who studied under Gamaliel in Acts 22:3.
He was a tentmakeradvanced in Judaism.  Galatians 1: 11-14. His familiarity in both Greek and Roman culture was evident in his letters as was his status as a Pharisee well versed in mosaic law. In the process of my research it also became apparent to me it was possible the respective paths of Jesus and Paul could have crossed given proximity in their ages, but this was not persued as it was not crucial to my enquiry. 
The traditional view Gospel details were already well known I found unconvincing. Surely Paul would want to make the link and confirm the sayings or parables of Jesus if he deemed such affirmation was relevant. Similarly all of the apostles who experienced the vision of the resurrected Christ would have not severed ties and communicated any new information relevant to Paul.    
Instead my research led me to an answer that stares us in the face. This is evident in the momentous event recorded in the last of the synoptic Gospels namely Luke: Acts. Here we find direct evidence Paul reaffirmed the earlier tacit agreements with the apostles.    
What this demonstrated to me is Paul’s lack on any detail in his letters was because that was all that was agreed upon by the apostles. Whilst there can be no doubt a growing oral gospel would emerge later neither Paul nor the apostles saw any reason to expand upon the simple good news account confirmed in the texts. 

The background of Jesus
In contrast Jesus’s background remains a mystery. There is very little known of his early life and even where he was brought up which is assumed to be Nazareth.  Even that is subject to some controversy as the reliable Jewish historian Flavius Josephe in his  summary of galilee he makes no mention to Nazareth in the list since it was established much later.  There is no historical record of Jesus directly connected with a sect such as the Nazarene / Essenes that might explain this. Only the contact  with John the Baptist and his disciples.
What we can say is Jesus as  a committed Jewish male  would have made every effort to attend the pilgrim festivals which were held each year (Passover, Hanukah and Succoth), meaning he conceivably could have visited frequently either before or during his 3 years public ministry. That would have afforded the opportunity for Paul to become aware of his sayings and teachings but we have no way of knowing for sure if any such exchanges took place.   
Why St Paul made so few references in his letters to the gospels and to the sayings of Jesus or to his teachings.
What is revealed by St Paul in his letters is his oft repeated idea of his mystical “in Christ” union which formed a new but integral feature of his teachings, as a consequence of Paul’s revelation on the road to Damascus. Although Pauline theology remains somewhat vague as to how such a transformation actually takes place it may well be simply a function of a new idea which takes root from his revelation but is not reliant specifically on a past ministry. Hence there seems no need to document or indeed preach a too detailed account of Christ’s earthly existence. Moreover in my view one might logically assume Paul had tacit approval by the other apostles who had experienced the vision of the “Risen Christ”. They were emboldened by this event which no doubt was the catalyst for them to go out and establish the fledgling Christian communities and to spread the " good news" in the format under which they all had agreed.  
What subsequently transpired, which is hardly surprising, is the inclusion of an increasing role of converted gentiles in the fledgling churches established by Paul began to rise of many issues evident in his letters. I now return to the momentous event recorded in the last of the synoptic Gospels namely in Luke: Acts. Here we find direct evidence Paul finally came to a common consensus. We learn  Paul revisited Jerusalem “after 14 years” to “set before them the Gospel I proclaim among the Gentiles. In order to make sure I was not running in vain” Galatians 2: 2.
Many years previously in the Acts of the Apostles there is reference to arguments with Peter which caused them to go in separate ways. But such differences seems most likely to be confined to the form and the extent or otherwise converted gentiles were to become Christians in the new order.
What we can gather from this momentous meeting is that Paul formed a consensus with those present. Under 1 Cor15:11 they were in effect all on the same page. A natural corollary to such a conclusion however is to ask the question why then were the Gospel Accounts subsequently  penned in such detail.
In attempting to answer this question one can at least agree on a few rather obvious factors inherent in examining the respective synoptic narratives. What we can say in summary is there is a contrast in purpose due to the changing audience to which they were primarily directed. The oldest as in Mark which was theological in nature and depicts an isolated Christ on the Cross. In Matthew which restates most of the material presented in Mark we have Jesus now surrounded by others, suggesting a much wider audience. These accounts rather obviously arose from a longstanding oral tradition which in itself was during a period of marked Christian diversity suggesting a changing purpose.   
But in Luke we have significant departure from the first two with much more detail but many exclusions evident for instance in the nativity depictions.   
What we can discern from this is they were written to evolving audiences, to existing Christian communities to answer questions and help unite different factions that inevitably arise over time. But the question remains if consensus was reached why then was Luke: Acts written in such great detail?
Once again an answer stands out starkly from the text itself, as the following facts give rise to a remarkable conclusion:
Luke appears to be the same person who accompanied Paul on his missionary journeys, as in 2 Tim 4:11.
The reason for the huge amount of detail and comprehensive  summary of all of the events In the Acts of the Apostles could have been to assist Paul due to stand trial before Caesar. Paul incidentally was determined to stand trial as a Jew rather than claim he belonged to another sect outside Judaism which would have rendered him of no interest to the Roman authorities.  
His trial was over alleged heresy in relation to the Law of Moses and that he defiled the Temple by stirring up trouble amongst  his followers which lacked respect to the Temple. At that time Roman law recognised the Jewish law so to be found guilty of one was to be held treasonable to Rome.

Bear in mind the author Luke talks about bringing clarity to the events that had been recorded previously and addresses his Gospel initially to just one person who remains unknown but conceivably might be a Roman official. 
The above points underpin the need to iron out inconsistencies in terms of what was evolving in the oral tradition evident in the  prior synoptic gospels of Mark and Matthew.

Hence all of the forgoing adds weight to the idea Paul’s decision not to include in his letters any detail on the gospels had some validity as it likely to muddy the waters on what was increasingly becoming a gentile audience. Notwithstanding he remained a Jew, and no doubt upheld the practices of Judaism, whilst asserting certain traditions were not necessary for incoming Gentiles.        
Why St Paul made so few references in his letters to the gospels or elaborated  on them in any detail in my view is because consensus was reached on what to preach on a “resurrected Christ’ which rendered the detailed gospel accounts unnecessary.  

The purpose why Luke: Acts was written which was to support Paul in his trail before Caesar, but as to why the others were retained to become later canonized to form the New testament is way beyond the scope of this brief paper.
But what we can say is what we have today is a New Testament which is a moving feast of the propensity to adapt the events surrounding Christ’s ministry from the original unsigned manuscripts. Early Christianity was certainly far more diverse than we can image today with subsequent amendments stretching centuries on to reflect an intended audience and diversity of ideas at that time.  In fact to lesser or greater manner that is what underpins the sacred texts of all religions of the world.  
But for Christianity, I think in humility, we must accept the fact that we simply don’t know a great deal about Christ’s early life and even what he meant by the messianic kingdom yet to come which remains largely unrealized. Paul suggested that we can live a life free from the bondage of the law in a spirt of kindness which might embrace us as a mysterious holy spirit, the rest remains a mystery.  

Tuesday, August 16

Marvellous Melbourne

Over the weekend we stayed in the heart of Melbourne at Southbank, experiencing  a  rare burst  of sun shine and warmth. Some of the pictures were taken from the apartment where we stayed.  

On Monday we joined retirees members from my previous employer ( I am the Victorian co coordinator ) to enjoy the Morning Melodies concert at the Arts Centre at Southbank which featured International soprano sensation Mirusia who thrilled the audience with her beautiful yet powerful presentation, augmented by her outstanding classical ensemble. It only cost members $17 and was wonderful value as Mirusia made her Hamer Hall debut with a well-rounded variety of popular and classical numbers including such favourites as Schubert’s ‘Ave Maria’, and Andrew Lloyd Webber’s ‘Memory’ (from Cats).   
Afterwards we luncheoned  at PJ O’Brien’s Irish Pub- see the picture of their Irish  pie with drink for only $20 which I was able to cover  from my very modest subsidy.   

It is always good to catch up with the latest news. Many members have been holidaying in the warmer regions of the far North and the Gold Coast as Melbourne’s experienced its wettest months in July for over 30 years. In July we enjoyed a stay in Byron Bay where the sea water was warm enough for many hearty souls to enjoy a surf. Others moved further afoot to Honolulu where the weather was super, 28 every day. But the highlight was to hear to learn one member was expectantly awarded a local Community Award for 2016 – having served a staggering 46 years as either Committee Member or President of the local tennis and bowling clubs.  Additionally to the awards he was given $250 for the charity of his choice which he gave to the St Vincent DePaul Soup Van.

The retirees group is made up of many to whom 30 years plus prior service is not uncommon but such longevity sadly belongs to a past era not likely to be repeated.    

Friday, August 5

Less than a great result

If you list a public company the expectation is you will provide a satisfactory return  for your shareholders who are after all the owners of that business. In effect, a public entity and its CEO along with the executives act as stewards to stakeholders to invest wisely on their behalf. Success and ethical conduct go hand in hand to enhance an entities reputation and create the positive flow on effect of brand recognition for the company to flourish over the longer term.  By providing superior customer service. and acting in a responsible manner returns are likely to be boosted and not deteriorate.

Of course failure frequently do occur when a listed company manages to loose most of its value. In such event usually the reputation of the directors suffers a blow - particularly where business conditions are not  sufficiently challenging  to generate above average failure rates.  What one often sees is a CEO continuing to be rewarded notwithstanding  incurring heavy losses sustained by shareholders.  Once such group 's track record doesn't  augur go well for one Donald Trump.
click here for more reading.
Recently the ABC's Q &A program gave their take on the us election. The lively discussion by the panellists from different perspectives included the likes of political satirist PJ O'Rourke and previous foreign minster Bob Car. Either way it seems not a great result is expected but even stanch republican O'Rourke is reluctantly now going to vote for Hilary.    
Click here for the summary. 

Tuesday, August 2


The Hebrew writers and poets of the OT told stories which embraced myths and were expert story tellers as they attempted to add meaning to their life and culture. The problem is, of course, the writers more often than not made up these stories on the basis they were never intended by their readers to be taken literally or be believed as true events.Rather the intention was to bring fresh insight into their existence and to underpin a philosophy or recipe for living.  One such story suggests undue favouritism, a will to power and redemption are inextricably linked in the very familiar story of Joseph and his coat of many colours.

Here is my poem which attempts to tell the story.  
Blessed by his father’s hands

Always resting at his side.

Envy of his brother’s hearts   

Schemed to end his life.


One brother feared,   

Let not blood stain our hands,

Sell him to slavery, share the spoils.      

Dipped his coat in animal blood.

“Dear father –Joseph now is dead”.


Joseph enslaved. Interpreted dreams.

His fame spread, his council sought.

From Pharaoh’s dream he revealed   

Seven years’ plenty, thence famine be.
Pharaoh to Joseph, be my ruler, he decreed  

Go harvest aplenty, let my silos overflow

Until famine came, just as Joseph foretold  

Food for all nations, across a barren country        

Until famine was his brothers' fate,

Came begging at Josephs feet,

What lesson would Joseph now impart?


Thursday, July 28

Architecture that makes a difference

Architecture can have a much more profound effect on our disposition that we generally realise. Seeing something beautiful and well designed not only raises out sprits but contributes to our well being in a practical  sense to achieve much better social outcomes . For instance prisons which are smaller and more open have vastly superior outcomes for rehabilitation than the impersonal mega structures  prone to violence and alienation we continue to build..A city that has laneways converted to restaurants for pedestrians and designated common areas to congregate  will exude a certain welcoming air of goodwill.    

The ancient Greek philosophers understood this very well and in particular Aristotle.  Scholar  Andrew Murray presented  this interesting paper at a conference I attended.  Click here should it be of interest.

What it highlights is the need for all vocations to include at least one elective in philosophy whose rich history in thinking throughout the ages adds to ones collective ideas of the many novel ways of meeting social demands.         

Saturday, July 23

Honeywell's quest for cleaner more sustainable outcomes

If you would like to read about Honeywell’s quest to be innovative and secure a cleaner, healthier  and more friendly environment click here.

Of course companies should always be encouraged to adopt socially environmental  responsible practices. In fact this should always have been the case. It as an indictment of our civilised sate to think otherwise.
My preference is for descriptive provisions or guiding principles as otherwise we are in danger of thinking ethics and environmental sustainability rests only be in the hands of highly trained people.
Honeywell's approach gives one considerable encouragement that enhanced corporate social responsibility goes hand in hand with a superior brand recognition to benefit both  shareholders and the environment. This is part of a quiet revolution not widely reported in the popular press that has ben going on for decades.

But a lot of the benefits have been lost in the growth in populations and because of rampant consumerism. Recent trends suggest  however that the rate of growth has reduced steadily from the 1970's, mainly due to a slowing in fertility rates. In the meantime as the global population continues to increase, albeit at slower rate, many more enlightened corporates are finding new ways to reduce our energy and material footprint.     

Friday, July 8

Beware simplistic protectionism

My letter was published today in the AFR.

In "Vehement defence of populism" (Letters, July 6), David Havyatt points to a growing inequality amongst voters tired of waiting for trickle-down benefits and suggests business should reject neoliberal rhetoric if it wants to assist in much-needed reform to Australian politics.

Populism is being fuelled by politicians watering down their "social demand" responsibilities to provide basic services and employment opportunities as existed in the past during less prosperous but more stable times. The risk is if we continue down this track, we will see a return to simplistic protectionism solutions that are gathering pace abroad.

Unless governments, in consultation with business, provide a much-needed boost to confidence with an industry-by-industry plan supported by policy measures, the angst against incumbent political parties is set to continue. Trade agreements, for instance, can enhance national outcomes, so long as any fallout from misplaced workers is matched with funded retraining opportunities. Otherwise you risk undermining confidence to the extent the benefits may fail to materialise.

But, to have a comprehensive industry policy across all major industries will require a bipartisan political approach, as suggested recently by former Reserve Bank governor Warwick McKibbin. There is nothing innovative or exciting about losing one's livelihood or having to accept substantially lower working conditions or services whilst observing a growing level of inequality.  

Friday, July 1

Brexit according to a technicrat

According to All Tech considered if you judge a country's interests only by prevalent Google searches, it was after the polls closed when British voters started to think seriously about the implications of their choice.
Of course this headline is somewhat tongue in cheek. But I do think there was a paucity of objective debate with a propensity instead to gravitate to the more extreme views on both sides of the fence. As they say never let the facts get in the way of good story.
Another view according to a leading economist is few people were really concerned about the EU (especially in view of the fact England was never part of the Euro currency) until some of the Tories started to blame everything on the EU and stirred up the anti establishment movement which is gaining traction globally. Tribalism reaches across all social classes, evident in the upper levels of the legal fraternity fearing legal business was migrating to EU courts. Of course one would be a fool to ignore a growing frustration amongst voters but all too often we see a gravitation to attribute blame to an external party when problems need to be sheeted home to the government in the first instance.

Central banks, including the EU, would not need to have such loose monetary policy given better management of their respective economies by their politicians. So its easy to form uninformed conspiracy theories when politicians have abrogated their "social  demand"  responsibilities (by social demand I mean governance in terms of full employment and provision of services etc etc )to the extent reasonable social demands are not being met. This has been a growing trend and differs to the degree "social demand" was taken far more seriously in the immediate post war period of almost full employment when we were less prosperous in aggregate than now but there was less inequality. But doubtless to say there will be many opinions from both sides of the divide with some claiming the exit frees England of the influence of a right wing EU.
But the opinion I would countenance is it was a non event until such time as it become a furious party debate and Cameron wanted to end the animosity but subsequently misjudged the outcome. Interestingly enough what this also reveals I think is a growing number of young people are not so inclined to tribalism as the old brigade which gives me a sense of optimism about the future.